[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Request for review: perl-Want
- From: Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 freenet de>
- To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Request for review: perl-Want
- Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 13:00:31 +0200
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 12:36 +0200, Oliver Falk wrote:
> On 07/01/2005 11:45 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 11:26 +0200, Oliver Falk wrote:
> > This would be a bit more general than what I use, but doesn't have any
> > impact on this package's behavior.
>
> It's just because the perl spec template does it this way, so I
> recommend it as well!
Let me put it this way: To me, all that matters is function.
So, I am not going to adopt a template for stylish reasons, when I have
something that "appears to work" for years.
If others feel "slavishly hanging on to templates is a good thing", I am
giving them "card blanche" to modify my perl-rpm-specs after cvs check
in.
Ralf
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]