On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 12:36 +0200, Oliver Falk wrote:
On 07/01/2005 11:45 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 11:26 +0200, Oliver Falk wrote:
This would be a bit more general than what I use, but doesn't have any
impact on this package's behavior.
It's just because the perl spec template does it this way, so I
recommend it as well!
Let me put it this way: To me, all that matters is function.
So, I am not going to adopt a template for stylish reasons, when I have
something that "appears to work" for years.
If others feel "slavishly hanging on to templates is a good thing", I am
giving them "card blanche" to modify my perl-rpm-specs after cvs check
in.