[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Request for review: pygsl
- From: Michael Schwendt <bugs michael gmx net>
- To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Request for review: pygsl
- Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 16:04:24 +0200
On Fri, 01 Jul 2005 12:48:25 +0100, José Matos wrote:
> http://www.fc.up.pt/pessoas/jamatos/pygsl.spec
> http://www.fc.up.pt/pessoas/jamatos/pygsl-0.3.2-1.src.rpm
Hmm, may I add that it is preferred form during reviewing to bump release
with every package revision? I just arrived at Tom's review, clicked on
above link and found a spec file which doesn't match the reviewed
items. E.g. Tom points out that the pygsl directory is not included in the
package. Contrary to that, in the spec I see that the directory is
included, but no files at all:
%files
%defattr(-,root,root)
%doc ChangeLog README CREDITS doc/ examples/
%dir %{python_sitelib}/pygsl
Should be:
%files
%defattr(-,root,root)
%doc ChangeLog README CREDITS doc/ examples/
%{python_sitelib}/pygsl/
[...]
Without intentions to review this, I noticed:
%install
python setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
Should be:
%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
python setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
--
Michael Schwendt <mschwendt users sf net>
Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) - Linux 2.6.11-1.35_FC3
loadavg: 1.06 1.34 1.41
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]