Am Mi, den 13.07.2005 schrieb Oliver Falk um 16:11: > U r welcome. Let us see the new release for further review. :-) > Oliver I think what Tomas Mraz <tmraz redhat com> replied "Yes, it is, however this doesn't mean that it will work correctly for programs using PAM which don't call pam_setcred." is actually a show stopper for the RPM. At least I understand it that way. From my point of view not any add-in PAM module should break PAM in any way. So if pam_abl breaks things under specific conditions I would withdraw my suggestion / review request. Alexander -- 1024D/866ED681 2005-07-11 Alexander Dalloz (Fedora Project) <alex dalloz de> Key fingerprint = CD40 0A91 7814 C1E4 5940 8E0E 1FD5 C316 866E D681
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil