[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Request for review: koffice
- From: Andreas Bierfert <andreas bierfert lowlatency de>
- To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Request for review: koffice
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:09:08 +0200
Warren Togami wrote:
> Than has done absolutely nothing wrong. Red Hat engineers AFAIK have
> never bypassed any established process. We have however considered
> packages previously in Core but dropped as not requiring review before
> import into Extras. If this has not been noted in the procedures then
> THAT is my fault.
Not a problem... it just would have been nice to get a notice on this
thread... that is all.
> Dennis if your package is superior to the original Red Hat package, then
> you are welcome to replace whatever is in CVS and become the new
> maintainer. I'll take a look at your package now myself.
If it is the FC3 package than one bonus could be the ooo like split up
of koffice...
- Andreas
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]