[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Request for review: koffice
- From: Andreas Bierfert <andreas bierfert lowlatency de>
- To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Request for review: koffice
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 22:23:23 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Warren Togami wrote:
> How about this idea, koffice-suite (another sub-package) contains
> nothing, but Obsoletes koffice and koffice-i18n and Requires all of the
> koffice applications. If Obsoletes causes replacement during upgrade,
> then the entire suite is installed during an upgrade.
Sounds like a good solution.
> If the sysadmin wants to cut it down, uninstall koffice-suite (which
> effects nothinge else) and remove other sub-packages to suite tastes?
Yes, I would want such a upgrade path. Loosing applications due to upgrade stuff
is not good but cutting down after should not be a problem.
- - Andreas
- --
Andreas Bierfert | http://awbsworld.de | GPG: C58CF1CB
andreas bierfert lowlatency de | http://lowlatency.de | signed/encrypted
phone: +49 2402 102373 | cell: +49 172 9789968 | mail preferred
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFC4AQ7QEQyPsWM8csRAhy0AKC8BHpR/UV2fXYaFxqjccBw8K4DcwCgm9Gw
v+h2LcuM2OCPVer3SCPa4gY=
=GSDZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]