Am Do, den 28.07.2005 schrieb Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams um 17:58: > On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 16:21 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 11:21 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > > > On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 16:36 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > > > > http://www.uni-x.org/review/lzo2.spec > > > > > > - Erase the .la file instead of using %exclude > > > > Why? > > On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 17:26 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > > I have no problem to do so. Would be kind if you could explain me why > > the "%exclude" is wrong. It is the same as used in the lzo-1.08 Extras > > package spec. > > It messes up the package's metadata. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89661 Ignacio, thank you for that information. Curiously I do not see a difference whether I "%exclude" the .la file in %files (-1 release) or whether I rm it in %install (-2 release): $ ~/rpmsizetest.sh lzo2-2.01-1.i386.rpm * 143201 143185 lzo2-2.01-1.i386.rpm $ ~/rpmsizetest.sh lzo2-2.01-2.i386.rpm * 143201 143185 lzo2-2.01-2.i386.rpm Alexander -- 1024D/866ED681 2005-07-11 Alexander Dalloz (Fedora Project) <alex dalloz de> Key fingerprint = CD40 0A91 7814 C1E4 5940 8E0E 1FD5 C316 866E D681
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil