On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 01:42 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > Am Do, den 28.07.2005 schrieb Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams um 17:58: > > On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 17:26 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > > > I have no problem to do so. Would be kind if you could explain me why > > > the "%exclude" is wrong. It is the same as used in the lzo-1.08 Extras > > > package spec. > > > > It messes up the package's metadata. > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89661 > > Ignacio, > > thank you for that information. Curiously I do not see a difference > whether I "%exclude" the .la file in %files (-1 release) or whether I rm > it in %install (-2 release): > > $ ~/rpmsizetest.sh lzo2-2.01-1.i386.rpm > * 143201 143185 lzo2-2.01-1.i386.rpm > > $ ~/rpmsizetest.sh lzo2-2.01-2.i386.rpm > * 143201 143185 lzo2-2.01-2.i386.rpm *shrug* I can only report information I'm given. If your findings refute that then so be it. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez ivazquez net> http://fedora.ivazquez.net/ gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part