[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: New package, review needed: icecast
- From: Andreas Thienemann <andreas bawue net>
- To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: New package, review needed: icecast
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:57:35 +0200 (CEST)
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:
> If you're going to package a branch, you should make a separate package
> completely. If upstream doesn't feel it should be released as the main
> branch, there is a reason.
Uhm, well. Karl is one of the upstream coders and his branch is located on
svn.xiph.org, so it's not exactly some random hack's branch.
As far as I can see, his branch is just used to test new code which will
then make it into the main branch.
Thus the codebase is _very_ similar to icecast-trunk.
> You could do this by using transform-name for configure, or by making a
> package with a different name that conflicts with a package named
> "icecast".
transform-name? Never heard of that.
What would you suggest? Naming the package icecast-kh? And conflicting it
with icecast while providing a virtual icecast package at the same time?
bye,
andreas
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]