[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Request for review: tetex-prosper (license)
- From: "Jose Pedro Oliveira" <jpo di uminho pt>
- To: "Ed Hill" <ed eh3 com>
- Cc: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Request for review: tetex-prosper (license)
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 20:02:39 +0100 (WEST)
> and come back to this discussion only after you have figured out that
> prosper is licensed under something OTHER than the LPPL.
My mistake. Must have loaded the wrong latex file. But I did see this
package licensed as LPPL in the CTAN catalogue:
http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/help/Catalogue/entries/prosper.html
But this package is also licensed as GPL according to the Sourceforge
summary page
http://sourceforge.net/projects/prosper/
I think it is better to contact the author.
jpo
--
José Pedro Oliveira
* mailto: jpo di uminho pt * http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/~jpo *
* gpg fingerprint = F9B6 8D87 859D 1C94 48F0 84C0 9749 9EB5 91BD 851B *
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]