[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: x86_64 status (was Re: Errors on x86_64 (broken c++ headers?))
- From: Adrian Reber <adrian lisas de>
- To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: x86_64 status (was Re: Errors on x86_64 (broken c++ headers?))
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 21:34:15 +0200
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 10:24:36PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 13:42 -0500, Quentin Spencer wrote:
> > Are there docs anywhere
> > that say what exactly is guaranteed to be in a build environment and
> > therefore don't need to be explicitly listed in the spec file?
> > (Apparently the c++ stuff in the past had to be required explicitly, but
> > now it does not?)
>
> If you consider these as docs, then yes :)
> http://fedoraproject.org/buildgroups/3/i386/buildroots.xml
> http://fedoraproject.org/buildgroups/3/x86_64/buildroots.xml
I think there is a typo in that file. At the bottom of the page is
package with the name doxgen. I believe it should be doxygen.
Adrian
--
Adrian Reber <adrian lisas de> http://lisas.de/~adrian/
As usual, goodness hardly puts up a fight.
-- Calvin
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]