On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 10:33 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 07:27 -0800, Shahms King wrote: > >This post really has two questions, the first being: What do I need to > >do to get ipython (http://ipython.scipy.org) included in Extras? > > > >The project distributes packages that work on FC3 already, but given > >that they include "py23" and "py24" as the release number, I'm guessing > >they need to be cleaned up to match Fedora guidelines. > > > >This brings up my second, more general question. Is this the proper > >forum for requesting package additions? Or should I really just stand up > >and say "I'm willing to maintain this package for Extras" and start the > >QA process in bugzilla? > > > > Do it here, Starting the QA process in bugzilla just means fewer people > hear about it. > > -sv All right, will do. I have built an ipython package that should more closely conform to the Fedora guidelines than the "official" one at: http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/yum/fedora/3/RPMS.shahms/ipython-0.6.11-1.noarch.rpm http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/yum/fedora/3/SRPMS.shahms/ipython-0.6.11-1.src.rpm http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/yum/fedora/3/SRPMS.shahms/ipython.spec That should be a good start. If no one else wants to keep packaging AbiWord and Gnumeric, I'd be more than happy to maintain them as it would be a shame to see them disappear from Fedora altogether (and I happen to like both of them a lot more than OO.org ;-P) -- Shahms E. King <shahms shahms com> Multnomah ESD Public Key: http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/~sking/shahms.asc Fingerprint: 1612 054B CE92 8770 F1EA AB1B FEAB 3636 45B2 D75B
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part