Re: ipython anyone?

[seth vidal <skvidal phy duke edu>]

> I wasn't sure, I figured it was best to mark them as documentation
> anyway, but that's easily remedied.  Not including any documentation
> means the package doesn't own the doc dir and it doesn't get removed
> with the rest of the files, however. Would adding a '%dir %
> {_datadir}/blablah' be approriate? That seems a little kludgy.

I'm pretty sure the %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version} ownership is handled by rpm within the %doc tag


> Sure, the quixote RPMS should be up shortly (just making sure they work
> on my x86_64 machine at home as they aren't noarch).  I don't currently
> package durus, but will look into it. If it's as easy to package as most
> python libraries, I don't imagine it will take very long.
good. thanks.


> The package naming guidelines page doesn't specify a name format for
> python modules, but I'm assuming the convention is similar to that for
> perl modules? i.e. python-${source_name}
yes they do:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageNamingGuidelines#head-bb4665ea46aa0653710ab594efb3207a94eda636

Submit your CLA and stuff as described here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/CvsAccess

and cc me on the emails.

thanks!
-sv