Re: Maintainership: dietlibc

[Nils Philippsen <nphilipp redhat com>]

On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 15:26 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Warren Togami (wtogami redhat com) said: 
> > I think if it was in Core before, we shouldn't hesitate to import it 
> > into Extras.  Any objections to this rule?
> 
> Assuming a maintainer steps forward, no objections. (Obviously, OK
> for dietlibc in this case.)

I've documented this on the NewPackageProcess wiki page.

Nils
-- 
     Nils Philippsen    /    Red Hat    /    nphilipp redhat com
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
 safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."     -- B. Franklin, 1759
 PGP fingerprint:  C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011