Re: ppracer

[Adrian Reber <adrian lisas de>]

On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 05:19:24PM +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 15:38 +0100, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > Yes, the correct RPM_OPT_FLAGS are used by the compiler without any
> > changing or setting of CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS.
> 
> Now I've seen the light... recent ppracer does indeed honour the
> CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS set by %configure. Sorry for me taking so long ;-).

Finally :-) I already thought it is my fault.

> > That's okay :-) I have nothing against the patch I just thought that it
> > should be possible to do it without a patch. But this is definitely not
> > something blocking the package in any way.
> 
> I'll remove the patch (now that I see it's not necessary anymore), can I
> consider it approved then?

Considered it approved. It builds and works for me. I will post an
APPROVED mail to -commits if you like and if it necessary...

		Adrian
-- 
Adrian Reber <adrian lisas de>            http://lisas.de/~adrian/
Beauty:
	What's in your eye when you have a bee in your hand.