[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Request for Review: dhcp-forwarder, dietlibc, ip-sentinel, util-vserver + xca
- From: Michael Schwendt <bugs michael gmx net>
- To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Request for Review: dhcp-forwarder, dietlibc, ip-sentinel, util-vserver + xca
- Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 19:20:39 +0200
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 18:45:37 +0200, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> >> > BuildRoot: %_tmppath/%name-%version-%release-buildroot
> >> > The prevered value is
> >> > "%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)"
> >>
> >> There is no big difference except the '%(%{__id_u} -n)' which does not
> >> make much sense but adds complexity and gives a false feeling about
> >> security. You have always a race between
> >
> > If memory serves correctly, the %__id_u thing was not for added
> > security, but a somewhat sane default for multi-user environments
>
> "multi-user environments" implicates security measures.
The obvious thing it does is to choose a different built root for every
user. You don't even know whether the users are trusted or not. If it's a
multi-user environment with untrusted users, overriding build root in
~/.rpmmacros would add security on a per-user basis.
- References:
- Request for Review: dhcp-forwarder, dietlibc, ip-sentinel, util-vserver + xca
- Re: Request for Review: dhcp-forwarder, dietlibc, ip-sentinel, util-vserver + xca
- Re: Request for Review: dhcp-forwarder, dietlibc, ip-sentinel, util-vserver + xca
- Re: Request for Review: dhcp-forwarder, dietlibc, ip-sentinel, util-vserver + xca
- Re: Request for Review: dhcp-forwarder, dietlibc, ip-sentinel, util-vserver + xca
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]