[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Request for Review: dhcp-forwarder, dietlibc, ip-sentinel, util-vserver + xca
- From: Enrico Scholz <enrico scholz informatik tu-chemnitz de>
- To: fedora-extras-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Request for Review: dhcp-forwarder, dietlibc, ip-sentinel, util-vserver + xca
- Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 20:17:42 +0200
bugs michael gmx net (Michael Schwendt) writes:
>> >> > BuildRoot: %_tmppath/%name-%version-%release-buildroot
>> >> > The prevered value is
>> >> > "%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)"
>> > ...
>> > If memory serves correctly, the %__id_u thing was not for added
>> > security, but a somewhat sane default for multi-user environments
>>
>> "multi-user environments" implicates security measures.
>
> The obvious thing it does is to choose a different built root for every
> user.
The buildroot mentioned above (this with '%__id_u') is unique per user,
but not secure. You need a %_tmppath which is only writable by the the
actual user.
Enrico
Attachment:
pgp00209.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Request for Review: dhcp-forwarder, dietlibc, ip-sentinel, util-vserver + xca
- Re: Request for Review: dhcp-forwarder, dietlibc, ip-sentinel, util-vserver + xca
- Re: Request for Review: dhcp-forwarder, dietlibc, ip-sentinel, util-vserver + xca
- Re: Request for Review: dhcp-forwarder, dietlibc, ip-sentinel, util-vserver + xca
- Re: Request for Review: dhcp-forwarder, dietlibc, ip-sentinel, util-vserver + xca
- Re: Request for Review: dhcp-forwarder, dietlibc, ip-sentinel, util-vserver + xca
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]