Erm,
My name is Seth, not Erm, it's a common misspelling, though. :-D
The idea was to add an shareware-data rpm for those who don't have the registered version Yes.
1) It is not as if sourcecode for the datafiles exist, they are after all data, not Machine instructions. The data can be edited with freely available tools. How does this differ from png's distributed with other programs?
2) I thought that oss programs needing closed data/firmware was OK as long as the data/firmware is freely redistributable. Isn't the plan for example to distribute intell wireless firmware in core as soon as it some problems with it not being 100% freely redistributable are fixed.
If something is good enough for core, then why isn't it good enough for extras?
I think firmware falls under a different category but IANAL. We should ask the fedora legal folks. Want me to ping at the powers-that-be about this?