[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Valid Group names
- From: seth vidal <skvidal phy duke edu>
- To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Cc: icon mricon com
- Subject: Re: Valid Group names
- Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 18:24:27 -0400
On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 18:20 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 06:06:44PM -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> > > I think I am missing the obvious, but is there a page in the Wiki with
> > > the valid Group names that can be used when creating packages?
> > /usr/share/doc/rpm-*/GROUPS
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RPMGroups
>
> It's kind of a weird list -- anything remotely related to math or science
> ends up getting lumpted into "Applications/Engineering".
>
> Personally, I think the list should be reduced to:
>
> Core
> Extras
>
> .
>
> For various reasons, it's been found to be more useful to keep the updated
> version of this metainformation externally -- in comps.xml and the (same
> format) yum groupfiles. Given that that's the case, having this
> slightly-askew list of round-peg-square-hole categories in the RPM itself
> ought to go.
<nod>
or better yet 86 the group list.
-sv
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]