Re: Approval needed: fftw3

[Chris Ricker <kaboom oobleck net>]

On Fri, 6 May 2005, Ed Hill wrote:

> Hi Quentin,
> 
> On an FC4t2 system, I checked out the latest fftw3 and all the following
> seemed to be in order:
> 
>  * specfile is very neat and easy on the eyes [;-)]
>  * no errors from rpmlint
>  * built, installed, and un-installed cleanly
>  * played with the fftwf-wisdom binary (but was not patient 
>      enough for for any exhaustive runs)
>  * checked file permissions & ownership
> 
> I can't find anything the matter with it so please add my name to a
> "reviewed and approved-by" message.

My understanding of the new-and-improved package submission process is 
that you (Ed), not Quentin, would be the one to send the APPROVED message 
to f-e-commits. I may well have missed something though ;-)

later,
chris