[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Approval needed: mlmmj

On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 23:14 +1000, Michael Fleming wrote:
> On Sat, 7 May 2005 08:21:24 -0400 (EDT). Chris Ricker waffled thusly:
> > On Sat, 7 May 2005, Michael Fleming wrote:
> > > - The source package also contains two web frontends (one in Perl and
> > > another in PHP) for maintaining the lists and allowing visitors to sign
> > > up. Should they be split off into a subpackage, included in %doc (which
> > > I've seen done for some other packages) or omitted completely (the
> > > current status). Otherwise creation of new lists is via a small shell
> > > script included in the current package - fine for shell access but not
> > > overly convenient.
> > 
> > subpackages would be nicest, I'd think
> This is possible, probably simpler - but the Requires: would be a case of
> "left as an exercise for the reader" unless you want it to get a little
> hairy (not /everyone/ has *both* PHP and perl on the system..)
Why not separate subpackages for each front-end?  Seems most admins
would install one that uses php _or_ one that uses perl, not both.


     t  o  s  h  i  o  @  t  i  k  i  -  l  o  u  n  g  e  .  c  o  m
                                                                GA->ME 1999

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]