Re: Fedora Extras Development Build Report

[David Woodhouse <dwmw2 infradead org>]

On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 17:03 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> It did not.
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=156213
> http://fedoraproject.org/extras/development/build-logs/ppc/gnupg2-1.9.15-2.log

Strange. It did for me an hour or two ago.

> Sometimes build failures are specific to mach or clean(er) chroots.

It could also have been a gcc bug which is since fixed. Did the package
maintainer actually look into it? _Is_ there a package maintainer?

Why is there a gnupg2-1.9.15-2.i386.rpm in Extras for i386? If the
package fails to build, it shouldn't get into the tree.

-- 
dwmw2