[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: wxGTK (was: Re: Package Build Report - Fedora Extras Development)



On Sat, 07 May 2005 19:15:05 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

> Am Samstag, den 07.05.2005, 18:07 +0200 schrieb Michael Schwendt:
> > On Sat, 07 May 2005 11:57:20 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > What is installed into the mach chroot for an x86_64 build? The i386
> > > > > version? The x86_64 version? Or both?
> > > > 
> > > > Both (at last will all yum-mach versions I've used).
> > > 
> > > It seems like a build error to me if it won't build with both
> > > installed. 
> 
> ++ (okay, it sometimes is the reason for some of those x86_64 build
> problems and makes a lot of those "autoreconf-patches" necessary -- but
> I also think is should be fixed, otherwise a lot of users might run into
> problems)
> 
> > Fine. Before anyone spends time on looking into it,[...]
> 
> I did a quick look. I can't get the current version in cvs (devel or
> FC3) or the published srpm for extras/3/ to build inside or outside mach
> on FC3 currently. I'll try to look into this deeper later or tomorrow.
> But I think the buildsystem/seth/yum is innocent ;-)

"configure" script has /usr/lib and /usr/X11R6/lib hardcoded in
at least half a dozen places and also does things like s/include/lib/g
in order to derive a list of library search paths from a list of header
search paths. Should be fixable for somebody with an x86_64 box and
maybe a few tries (to see what else is broken in there).

Really strange that the same software did built for x86_64 before.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]