[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Review request: syslog-ng (syslog replacement daemon)
- From: "Jose Pedro Oliveira" <jpo di uminho pt>
- To: "Discussion related to Fedora Extras" <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Review request: syslog-ng (syslog replacement daemon)
- Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 19:03:01 +0100 (WEST)
> On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 10:03 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 08:22:37AM -0400, Chris Ricker wrote:
>> > > * Changes a file from another package
>> > > (/etc/logrotate.d/syslog from the sysklogd rpm)
>> > I know people (with good reason!) try to avoid using alternatives, but
>> > isn't this a good case to use them?
>>
>> I haven't looked at this particular case, but if this is the only change
>> needed, might there be a way to generalize the /etc/logrotate.d/syslog
>> file
>> in the syslog RPM?
>
> My guess (just from a quick look at /etc/logrotate.d/syslog) is that
> this is due to the kill -HUP of the syslog process. Having syslog-ng
> use the same pid file could work, but could have other consequences that
> I'm not thinking of at the moment. Especially as I haven't looked at
> syslog-ng in a long time :-)
It won't work. People will change the syslog/syslog-ng configuration
files to modify/create/remove logging rules and logging destinations.
jpo
--
José Pedro Oliveira
* mailto: jpo di uminho pt * http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/~jpo *
* gpg fingerprint = F9B6 8D87 859D 1C94 48F0 84C0 9749 9EB5 91BD 851B *
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]