[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Fedora Extras Development Build Report
- From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2 infradead org>
- To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>, fedora leemhuis info
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: Fedora Extras Development Build Report
- Date: Sun, 08 May 2005 21:06:14 +0100
On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 18:15 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> With three archs currently I tend to agree. But let make this four or
> five:
>
> - request build
> - build fails on x86_64
> - fix + request build
> - build fails on ppc
> - fix + request build
> - build fails on IA64
> - fix + request build
> - build fails on sparc
> - fix + request build
> - done
>
> against:
> - request build
> - build fails on x86_64, PPC, IA64,sparc
> - fix + request build
> - done
>
> A lot easier IMHO
Trust me; even with the seven we build Core for, it never really works
like that. You won't find that a _different_ arch-specific bug is
introduced for each architecture, all at the same time. The closest you
might find is "function X needs implementing for each arch", and TBH if
you haven't managed to work that out for yourself by the time you hit
the second failure, you're being very silly. :)
--
dwmw2
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]