On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 11:46 -0500, Quentin Spencer wrote: > I think I remember something like this coming up here a while ago. I > recently imported octave from core to extras, and it has had an epoch > defined for years. I'm not sure why this was done, as octave has always > had very consistent version names. Since the use of the epoch tag now > seems to be frowned upon, would it cause problems if I removed the epoch > from the new Extras octave package? Yes, since the Epoch is non-zero and you're still expected to be able to handle updates/upgrades from FC3. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez ivazquez net> http://fedora.ivazquez.net/ gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part