Re: Mach setup

[seth vidal <skvidal phy duke edu>]

On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 18:28 +0800, Jeff Pitman wrote:
> On Saturday 14 May 2005 11:16, Jens Petersen wrote:
> > Btw is this the right place to discuss mach+yum? :)
> 
> Most likely since mach+yum is pretty much a fork until mach3 comes out.  
> Then, the mach devel list would be the place to discuss mach. (Unless 
> mach+yum remains an indefinite fork..)

it's an indefinite fork - for other reasons which I'll explain soon.

-sv