[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: request for review: hobbit
- From: Chris Ricker <kaboom oobleck net>
- To: Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: request for review: hobbit
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 11:37:40 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 11 May 2005, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 15:47 -0400, Chris Ricker wrote:
> > Anyone interested in reviewing hobbit?
> >
> > <http://www.oobleck.net/kaboom/fedora/srpms/hobbit-4.0.2-2.src.rpm>
> >
> > hobbit's a GPL'ed replacement for the server component of Big Brother. It
> > works with the Big Brother client (non-free), or with the free
> > hobbit clients which are under development, to monitor server /
> > application / network / etc. status
>
> Just a note - a company I used to work for had a webapp server that we
> wanted to call Gandalf, but the lawyers wouldn't let us because
> apparently the Tolkein family was legal happy or something. I don't know
> if hobbit would have the same issue, were hobbits something Tolkein took
> from lore, or is the name his invention?
The name has been used elsewhere (ie, the Hobbit Sinclair derivative
computer which was developed in the Soviet Union and sold for a time in
the UK without action from the Tolkien estate), including in usage which
pre-dates Tolkien; see <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hobbit_%28Denham%29>
for some discussion about this.
It does appear that "hobbit" is trademarked, though. Whether the trademark
would extend to an acronym name for a computer program, I don't know.
IANAL, etc. Thoughts?
thanks,
chris
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]