[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Request for approval: enemies-of-carlotta
- From: Aaron Kurtz <a kurtz hardsun net>
- To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Request for approval: enemies-of-carlotta
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 02:19:15 -0700
On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 11:06 +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 04:06:23PM -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
>
> > The no-binary thing is notable. This package doesn't contain a single
> > binary, its just a set of python scripts. For that reason, this package
> > is probably best suited as noarch.
>
> I made the package arch-specific because it precompiles the .py files
> and includes the .pyc file in the package. Is this format arch-independent
> (and while we are at it: what is the difference between pyc and pyo?)
Python bytecord or .pyc is arch-independent. .pyo is optimized bytecode.
http://www.network-theory.co.uk/docs/pytut/tut_48.html
It is also guaranteed to work between say 2.4 and 2.4.1, but not 2.3 and
2.4.
--
Aaron Kurtz <a kurtz hardsun net GPG Key ID: ED588CF2
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]