[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Review/sponsor needed: sqlite2

On Sun, 2005-04-24 at 11:49 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 17:28:33 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> > Shall I go ahead and import sqlite2 then?
> Fine with me in "devel" tree, but I don't maintain the three packages
> mentioned above. So, to demonstrate that coordination among packagers
> works, how about the package owners give their explicit "okay" at this
> point?

Okay, this has dragged out long enough. There has been *plenty* of time
for the maintainers to speak up, and so far only one has, giving his
assent. If no one can think of a reason to *not* import the sqlite2
package then I will proceed to do so this weekend.

Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez ivazquez net>

gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]