[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Build problems on x86_64
- From: Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 freenet de>
- To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Build problems on x86_64
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 12:39:21 +0200
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 05:28 -0500, Quentin Spencer wrote:
> I'm having more problems building packages on x86_64. In this case the
> package cln had already build successfully on PPC, but about 2/3 of the
> way through the build on x86_64 I get the following error:
>
> g++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -m64
> -mtune=nocona -I../include -I../include -I./integer -I./base/digitseq
> -I./base/digit -Ibase -I./base -c ./integer/conv/cl_I_mul10plus.cc
> -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/cl_I_mul10plus.o
> {standard input}: Assembler messages:
> {standard input}:154: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mul'
>
> I've never seen an error like this before.
This is the assembler ("as") complaining about the code being passed to
it containing invalid assembly code.
> Is there any possible
> explanation other than a bug in gcc?
Yes, broken inline asm, bug in as, bug in g++, bug in libstdc++
(templates can contain inline asm), invalid source code, etc.
You will want to have a look into the preprocessed sources
(gcc -save-temps) and check for the origin of this complaint.
Ralf
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]