[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Review/Approval needed: mfstools
- From: Matthias Saou <thias spam spam spam spam spam spam spam egg and spam freshrpms net>
- To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Review/Approval needed: mfstools
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 18:22:03 +0200
Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote :
> > /usr/bin/backup
> > /usr/bin/restore
> >
> > These files definitely need to have their name changed... not sure what
> > it'll break, though.
>
> Well, the only thing its likely to break is the documentation. Those are
> symlinks to mfstool. (/usr/bin/backup == /usr/bin/mfstool backup)
>
> And even then, the docs seem to refer to /usr/bin/mfstool backup
> instead. Renamed in the spec, should be fixed.
>
> Changes commited to CVS, take two? :)
Weird, with rpm -qplv I didn't see any symlinks in the package, and all
files in _bindir seemed to be real binaries to me... I'll have another
look now ;-)
Matthias
--
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) - Linux kernel 2.6.11-1.27_FC3
Load : 0.23 0.38 0.40
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]