Re: RFE: dietlibc review

[Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com>]

Enrico Scholz (enrico scholz informatik tu-chemnitz de) said: 
> >> ip-sentinel, dhcp-forwarder, util-vserver
> >
> > Odd, nothing about these requires dietlibc, AFAICT.
> 
> All of them contain something like
> 
> | %{!?_without_dietlibc:BuildRequires:	dietlibc}
> 
> Nitpicking between 'recommended' and 'required' does not make sense in
> the rpm-world ;)

Wasn't looking at the specs, actually; just the source; it certainly
doesn't require dietlibc in that sense.

Bill