notting redhat com (Bill Nottingham) writes: >> >> ip-sentinel, dhcp-forwarder, util-vserver >> > >> > Odd, nothing about these requires dietlibc, AFAICT. > ... > Wasn't looking at the specs, actually; just the source; it certainly > doesn't require dietlibc in that sense. As said, rpm does not know something like 'recommends'. For ip-sentinel and dhcp-forwarder it should not make much difference (except different resource usage at runtime) whether they are compiled/linked against dietlibc or glibc. But dietlibc is recommended for them. But for util-vserver, I hope that I made the warnings big and fat enough when the tools will be built against glibc. ;) Enrico
Attachment:
pgp2qyx7ubjnG.pgp
Description: PGP signature