Re: uqm update - RFC for uqm-content*

[Matthias Saou <thias spam spam spam spam spam spam spam egg and spam freshrpms net>]

Ville Skyttä wrote :

> [1] Cases like this make me wonder whether it would be a possible to
> host all noarch stuff in a noarch repository shared between i386, x86_64
> and ppc instead of having copies of all of this in each.  Or maybe not
> not _all_ noarch, but a "data" repository for cases where size matters.
> In addition to uqm-content*, torcs-data* and various other noarchs at
> the top of the listing at
> http://fedoraproject.org/extras/3/i386/?C=S;O=D would be good
> candidates.

Aren't all .noarch packages hardlinked already between the different
trees? Isn't that enough in order to save disk space?

Matthias

-- 
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) - Linux kernel 2.6.11-1.27_FC3
Load : 0.90 0.70 0.53