Re: Request for review: latex-prosper

["Michael A. Peters" <mpeters mac com>]

On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 23:34 -0400, Ed Hill wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 17:56 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> > http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/latex-prosper.spec
> > http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/latex-prosper-1.00.4-0.1.src.rpm
> 
> 
> Hi Michael,
> 
> This is not a full review (sorry, not enough time tonight!) but I did
> notice one item that confused me.  The prosper license says "LPPL" but I
> looked through the docs and could only find the following (see below)
> which appears to be very BSD-like (which is fine).

I thought it was Latex Project Public License - 
I've been looking at a lot of little latex addons - must've got
confused.
Good catch.