Le lundi 30 mai 2005 à 11:21 +0200, Michael Schwendt a écrit : > On Mon, 30 May 2005 09:43:22 +0200 (CEST), Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > > On Mon, 30 May 2005 10:31:05 +0800, Didier Casse wrote: > > > > >> The principle of splitting is not to download the whole thing. What do > > >> you propose as an alternative? > > > > Have a package with the core loaders and one or several for rarely used > > loaders. Add a virtual per loader and use it in other specs. Move loaders > > from optional to core as the actual use changes. > > Would that be worthwhile? Effectively, you would need to revisit all > dependencies regularly, as whether they add/remove usage of more loaders > or filters, and then flip the virtual dependencies accordingly. If the loader packages are really complex this is a good way to isolate its changes from the rest of the system. Now that's a compromise like everyone else - I just wanted to point out you had alternatives other than "a package per loader" or "a package for all the loaders" Regards,, -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part