Re: Request for review: latex-prosper

[Aaron Kurtz <a kurtz hardsun net>]

On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 20:32 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 10:39 +0800, Didier Casse wrote:
> > On 5/30/05, Michael A. Peters <mpeters mac com> wrote:
> > > http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/latex-prosper.spec
> > > http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/latex-prosper-1.00.4-0.1.src.rpm
> > > 
> > > This is the prosper class for latex
> > 
> > Dear Michael,
> >                     This is a nice tool. ;-)
> > 
> > I think for your Source0, it's better to write:
> > 
> > http://umn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/prosper/prosper-%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
> > 
> 
> I agree - but it easier for testers to get the source to md5sum check
> with upstream if macros aren't used in the source tag (IE they can cut
> and paste into a wget)

spectool is your friend. It's part of fedora-rpmdevtools. "spectool -g
package.spec" will fill in the macros and download the package. Wiki
says it's a matter of personal taste.

-- 
Aaron Kurtz <a kurtz hardsun net>             GPG Key ID: ED588CF2