Re: rpms/tetex-font-cm-lgc/devel tetex-font-cm-lgc.spec,1.7,1.8

[Sarantis Paskalis <sarantis cnl di uoa gr>]

On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 12:15:19PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 05:59 -0500, Sarantis Paskalis wrote:
> > -  /usr/bin/updmap-sys --quiet --nohash --outputdir %{texmf}/dvips/config --disable cm-lgc.map
> > +  updmap-sys --quiet --nohash --disable %{texpkg}.map
> >  fi
> > +texhash
> Why did you replace /usr/bin/updmap-sys with updmap-sys?
> 
> To me, this is a regression.

I tend to agree with the comment in
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2005-October/msg00593.html

<quote>
imho when a system utility is used to build/install - unless the
path is needed (ie /usr/sbin/foo) then it should use whatever comes
first in the path of the rpm builder (or rpm's defined path)
</quote>

And I might add, that we have a controlled build environment (mock) as
a given, which eliminates any possible conflicts.

Anyway, I am willing to follow the general consensus, but I have not
seen any guidelines on this.

-- Sarantis