[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Bug 171801] Review Request: libspectrum, lib765 and libdsk - libraries required for the fuse-emulator
- From: bugzilla redhat com
- To: fedora-extras-list redhat com
- Subject: [Bug 171801] Review Request: libspectrum, lib765 and libdsk - libraries required for the fuse-emulator
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 04:49:57 -0400
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libspectrum, lib765 and libdsk - libraries required for the fuse-emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171801
------- Additional Comments From paul city-fan org 2005-10-27 04:49 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> Surely though as fuse needs all three then to review each on their merit does
> seem a bit daft. All three have to go through at the same time!
>
> I can see your point, lib765 may hold the other two up (say). Shall I keep as
> is, or farm three out and just do this one for libspectrum?
My personal preference would be a separate review for each SRPM. I think that is
also the intention of the review process. It'll leave behind a separate "audit
trail" for each package where some design decisions may be discussed, without
being cluttered by discussion about other packages.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]