[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Bug 166191] Review Request: perl-Class-DBI-Pg : Class::DBI extension for PostgreSQL
- From: bugzilla redhat com
- To: fedora-extras-list redhat com
- Subject: [Bug 166191] Review Request: perl-Class-DBI-Pg : Class::DBI extension for PostgreSQL
- Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 06:24:56 -0400
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-DBI-Pg : Class::DBI extension for PostgreSQL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166191
paul city-fan org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|gdk redhat com |paul city-fan org
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From paul city-fan org 2005-09-02 06:24 EST -------
Review:
- rpmlint clean
- package and spec names OK
- package meets guidelines
- license is same as perl, matches spec
- spec written in English and is legible
- sources match upstream
- package builds OK in mock for FC4 (i386)
- BR's mostly OK
- no locales, libraries, subpackages or pkgconfigs to worry about
- not relocatable
- no directory ownership or permissions issues
- no duplicate files
- %clean section present and correct
- macro usage is consistent
- code, not content
- no large docs
- docs don't affect runtime
- no scriptlets
Needswork:
- redundant BR: perl
- include license text
- add perl(DBD::Pg) BR and probably dep too
Suggestions:
- honor %{?_smp_mflags}
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]