[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-04-05
- From: Ville Skyttä <ville skytta iki fi>
- To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 4 - 2006-04-05
- Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2006 20:31:16 +0300
On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 12:21 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "AB" == Andreas Bierfert <andreas bierfert lowlatency de> writes:
>
> AB> Well I don't know don't have any x86_64 boxes with fc3 or fc4
> AB> anymore. I don't think python-lcms or lcms-devel is needed. Could
> AB> somebody please test this. If it does not work maybe an easier
> AB> solution would be not pushing that wine subpackage...
>
> I have several FC3 and FC4 x86_64 boxes around; what exactly needs to
> be tested? I installed the lcms packages from both i386 and x86_64
> and rpm didn't complain about conflicts.
Thanks, good enough for me, I've modified the push scripts to copy lcms
over too.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]