[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: RRDtool is in need of attention
- From: Chris Ricker <kaboom oobleck net>
- To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: RRDtool is in need of attention
- Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:15:34 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Matthias Saou wrote:
> Lately, I haven't been using rrdtool as intensively as I used to, so my
> interest has gotten lower and the lack of "easy real world testing" I used
> to do has kept me from updating the package in a (way too) long while.
>
> If anyone uses rrdtool actively and wants to take over maintainership, I'd
> be more than welcome to pass it on!
>
> Current open bugzilla entries :
> * Upgrade request rrdtool to 1.2
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167904
> * rrdtool 1.0.50 has been released
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184003
> * Please rebuild the package
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185909
>
> What had kept me from updating to 1.2.x was the initial lack of PHP
> module, which would have introduced a regression. From what I've been
> told, there is now a working separate PHP module that could easily be
> included in Extras at the same time RRDtool gets updated to 1.2.x.
I use it a lot and don't mind maintaining it
Looks like cacti and munin are the two packages already in Extras which
use it. Do they both work with 1.2?
later,
chris
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]