[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: RFC: Fedora Extras EOL Policy
- From: Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com>
- To: Patrice Dumas <pertusus free fr>, Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: RFC: Fedora Extras EOL Policy
- Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 17:45:18 -0400
Patrice Dumas (pertusus free fr) said:
> > If someone uses Fedora Core 5, they can be certain that the content will
> > be maintained up until point X, and after that it will be looked at for
> > security issues by the existing Fedora Legacy team (which they can join.)
> >
> > With Extras... it's 'maybe, depending on the package'. Do you really expect
> > someone to look at a web page that has maintenance status for 3000 packages?
>
> Not really.
...
> What I want is that each maintainer decide for his package what
> kind of maintainance he does. And only if he does none (and nobody steped up)
> the package should be taken by the fedora extra legacy team which may have
> an homogenous maintainance goal, or not.
So, how does that avoid the question I just stated?
Bill
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]