A licensing question
Rahul Sundaram
sundaram at fedoraproject.org
Tue Apr 18 20:37:22 UTC 2006
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 12:06 -0700, Victor Skovorodnikov wrote:
> Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta at gmail.com> wrote:
> "non-commercial" is unacceptable.
>
> -jef
>
> --
> fedora-extras-list mailing list
> fedora-extras-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Would you please elaborate on as to why it is unacceptable? I though
> Fedora is, by definitiion, non-commercial.
Open source by definition mandates the ability to distribute code
commercially
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-8be956fd12dbe4ae927e65c989e7e83b9fcc0b80
Rahul
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list