A licensing question

Rahul Sundaram sundaram at fedoraproject.org
Tue Apr 18 20:37:22 UTC 2006


On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 12:06 -0700, Victor Skovorodnikov wrote:
> Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta at gmail.com> wrote:
>         "non-commercial" is unacceptable.
>         
>         -jef
>         
>         -- 
>         fedora-extras-list mailing list
>         fedora-extras-list at redhat.com
>         https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
> 
> Hi Jeff,
> 
> Would you please elaborate on as to why it is unacceptable?  I though
> Fedora is, by definitiion, non-commercial.

Open source by definition mandates the ability to distribute code
commercially 

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-8be956fd12dbe4ae927e65c989e7e83b9fcc0b80

Rahul




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list