[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop
- From: bugzilla redhat com
- To: fedora-extras-list redhat com
- Subject: [Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop
- Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 03:30:37 -0400
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904
------- Additional Comments From paul city-fan org 2006-04-19 03:30 EST -------
(In reply to comment #20)
> What it's doing is it's looking for /usr/lib/boo and when it's not found,
> creating it in %{buildroot} which is correct (the spec file says to do that).
But why does it say that? What's the point?
Supposing /usr/lib/boo *does* ecist on the build system. The directory won't get
created in the buildroot then. Looks horribly wrong to me.
> If you were building the rpm not in the FC rpmbuild system, but using the old,
> bung it into /usr/src/SOURCES, change to root, build, it would look for
> /usr/lib/boo and then create /usr/lib/boo if it wasn't found.
>
> At least, that's how I understand it!
If you've specified a buildroot in your spec file (as you must), it'll be
honoured whether you build it as a regular user or as root. But no sane person
builds packages as root.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]