Re: up-imapproxy (Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-04-20)

[Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora leemhuis info>]

Am Freitag, den 21.04.2006, 14:18 +0200 schrieb Michael Schwendt:
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 21:16:43 -0000, Michael Schwendt wrote:

> This is in bugzilla as
> 
>   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/185729  (and in the tracker bugs, too)
> 
> but the package maintainer has not responded in over a month.

He responded to me once in private; I forwarded it privately to a
potential maintainer.

> As soon as the buildsys server is reachable
> again, the packages will be removed from the repository, since they are broken
> anyway. 

Agreed

> Does it make sense to keep the fc4 packages? (I don't think so)

Why do you think so? 

I vote for leaving it around in FC4 (but if there are good reasons to
remove it from FC4 I'm fine with removing it).

CU
thl