[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: ATrpms' kernel modules (kmdls)
- From: Linus Walleij <triad df lth se>
- To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: ATrpms' kernel modules (kmdls)
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 17:18:27 +0200 (CEST)
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006, Warren Togami wrote:
Fedora packages are generally against keeping compatibility across many
distributions. The exception to this is if compatibility can be achieved
without making the spec look incredibly messy. In all other cases forking
the package is exactly what is expected.
This is also the lesson I learned from my reviewers. Write the spec for
one single FC release, keep it alive as long as that release lives and
then just drop it and move on to the living ones.
I used to try to write specs that would be for all distributions ("all" as
in Fedora, Mandriva, Yellow Dog...) was told I was doing something stupid,
then at one time tried to write for all distributions (as in FC1, FC2,
FC3, ...) and was dismissed again. So from a social law as to how people
react on your actions follows that this is simply not the Fedora way.
(Like I was thinking as a programmer trying to address all corner cases.)
However it would be good to have this as an official policy so everyone
get it at an early stage. Warren?
Linus
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]