Le dimanche 30 avril 2006 à 18:09 +0200, Hans de Goede a écrit : > > Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > When I had to choose between nomarch and arc for orphaning, no one stood > > for arc (nor, for that matter nomarch). So I decided to keep the most > > recent codebase in the tree. > > > > Yes its in decent shape, although it does throw 2 warnings about using > the unscure mktemp function. I think I'll patch those 2 and taken > ownership of arc. Choice is always good and it doesn't seem a lott of > work. If it does turn out to be more effort then its worth it it csn be > orphaned again (not that I'm planning on that). arc still got an upstream which is responsive - you can forward patches to them, they'll release new versions. <evil:plan>since arc is taken care of, may I drop nomarch?</evil:plan> -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part