Michael Schwendt wrote:
Tonight I've received the following bug http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201279I'm packager of the qstat tool. But the torque (in torque-client) already consists the /usr/bin/qstat.
Thanks for opinoin, but I think some miscommunication is present here. I'm not a packager of torque. As I understand you correctly the issue inhere torque than qstat. Anyway I've filled bug to torque with references to this maillist discussion already. I'm wating for torque packager response.Why isn't this program called "torque-qstat"? You could patch it and rename it like that. What is the sense in creating such a short and generic name like "qstat"? Is the program useful outside of "torque"? Could it be placed in /usr/libexec/torque/qstat instead if not renamed?
-- With best regards, Andy Shevchenko. mailto: andy smile org ua